Follow The Propagandist on Twitter

Subscribe to us! The Propagandist On Facebook Follow The Propagandist On Twitter Subscribe the The Propagandist by Email Get The Propagandist Newsletter

Donate to The Propagandist

libya revolution

Moammar Gaddhafi is dead. His reign of terror is ended.

This week, Libyan rebels planted an Al Qaeda flag where the revolution began.

Two steps forward, one step back?

Either way, it's mission accomplished:

"It's great to be in Libya, free Libya," Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO secretary general, told a media conference in the capital Tripoli.

"At midnight tonight a successful chapter in NATO history will come to an end. You have already started writing a new chapter in Libya's history," he said.

"We acted to protect you. Together we succeeded. Libya is finally free, from Benghazi to Brega, from Misrata to the Western Mountains and to Tripoli.

In the first video released today on YouTube (but presumably recorded at least a week ago), one robot-like woman condemns the international community and media conspiracy and lauds her hero, Moammar Gaddafi. In the second video, we see the liberators reacting to the fall of the dictator.

More >>

NATO's strategy on Libya is wandering a bit. To be fair, you might expect this in any group of 28 countries. But NATO isn't just any group: it is a military alliance. As such, there needs to be very clear direction from the top about how to complete the mission. Right now, it's not even totally clear what the mission is.

In the absence of such direction, we're happy to provide our own strategic advice to NATO's top brass.

Your mission is to protect Libyan civilians. The quickest, cheapest, easiest way to do that and reduce the chance of this conflict dragging out into a prolonged civil war is to kill, er, arrest Moammar Gaddafi.

It doesn't necessarily have to be NATO troops that do it. NATO is not the United Nations. Pretty much any country in the world now has authorization to "protect Libyan civilians". Send in an African Union force -- all of them, if need be. Or get the Chinese to send in a brigade or two. They have as much reason as any country to ensure oil supplies don't get stopped up by Gaddafi's intransigence.

Gaddafi is the problem. Get rid...More >>

We've pointed out the Arab League's hypocrisy on Libya before, but it feel's so nice, we're doing it twice. From Dennis Prager in the National Review:

Witnessing the Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi’s large-scale killings of Libyan civilians, the Arab League begged us, the Europeans, and the Security Council to militarily intervene on behalf of the Libyan people.
 

So, despite the fact that America is rather weary of fighting Muslim mass murderers, is militarily overstretched, and has a devastating national debt, America said yes. We are the most decent country on earth and even a liberal-Left Democrat in the White House feels the moral pull of America’s legacy, values, and unparalleled strength.


But no sooner have America and the Europeans intervened than the Arab League officially protests our intervention on the grounds that Libyan civilians — 48 claimed, zero confirmed, at the time of the protest — have been killed by the intervention requested by the Arab League.

More >>

libya revolution politics middle east democracy protesters bomb violenceIt’s official. If you had Muammar al-Gadhafi in your “biggest pussy in the known universe” office pool, you need to go collect your winnings.

Sorry, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Better luck next year.

As the world continues to digest reports that two Libyan air force pilots, allegedly ordered to bomb protesters, have defected to Malta it seems that Gadhafi has an even more grotesque joke to play on the civilized world. According to reports trickling out of Libya via news outlets like Al-Jazeera, Gadhafi may actually have pilots in his air force obliging enough to pull the trigger.

Of course, Al-Jazeera seems to hold questionable faith in these reports, putting quotation marks around the word “bomb”.

Gadhafi may not have even stopped there. Reports are also surfacing of Libyan troops opening fire on protesters with artillery.

With all of the means used to brutally suppress political dissent in countries like Iran and China, it seemingly took a butcher like Muammar al-Gadhafi to set the bar just a little bit higher.

I feel...More >>

Despite the brutal crackdown by Kadafi's thugs, resulting in at least 104 deaths at last count, the revolution is not backing down.

More >>

In a rambling and incoherent speech that may signal the death knell for the regime in Libya, Moammar Gadaffi's son Saif just ends up pouring gasoline on the fire of revolution.

First, he makes excuses for the heavy-handed and lethal approach of security forces who have been rampaging against the protesters (with over 200 deaths and over 500 injuries to show for it).

Then, he appears to blame the revolt on foreign-based traitors, Facebook and drug dealers.

Next, he explains that the fall of his father's regime would mean a reversion to a Hobbesian state of nature where every man selfishly and ruthlessly aims to master everyone else:

We will have a civil war like in 1936. American Oil Companies played a big part in unifying Libya. Who will manage this oil? How will we divide this oil amongst us? Who will spend on our hospitals? All this oil will be burnt by the Baltagiya (Thugs) they will burn it. There are no people there. 3/4s of our people live in the East in Benghazi, there is no oil there, who will spend on them? Your children will not go to schools or universities.

...More >>
Loading...

BUY @ the eSTORE

propagandist tshirt political merchandise buy magazine

Sponsor The Propagandist

Buy The Detective vs. the Slime Monster from Outer Space

political documentaries

Join The Propagandist

Buy A History of The Middle Eastside