Follow The Propagandist on Twitter

Subscribe to us! The Propagandist On Facebook Follow The Propagandist On Twitter Subscribe the The Propagandist by Email Get The Propagandist Newsletter

Donate to The Propagandist

Z Word

If Hamas has ever honored a truce with Israel for longer than five minutes, I'm not aware of it.

Rocket attacks on Israeli towns and cities have never stopped. As the rulers of the territory of Gaza, Hamas is responsible for preventing those attacks. Instead, they are active participants. One of the more dramatic attacks in recent months was in April, when Hamas militants fired a Kornet anti-tank missile at an Israel school bus.

As Hamas continued their attacks this week, one of their targets included... a bus. Again.

What truce?More >>

Just when one thought the anti-Israel boycott movement (BDS) could not get any sillier, it outdoes itself.

Those tireless activists are taking aim at a new target, moving from chickpeas to chocolate. But whereas the hummus wars have largely been confined to co-ops and college campuses, the cacao campaign is being fought on the public streets of Australia. Activists have focused their ire and fire on Max Brenner stores (“Chocolates from the Bald Man”). The sophistication of the protesters may be gleaned from their slogan, “Max Brenner, you can’t hide! You support genocide!”

Yikes! Sounds as if he should change his nickname to “the Bad Man.” But the rationale in the one case is as specious as in the other: Strauss, the parent company of both Sabra hummus and Brenner, has occasionally made charitable donations of food and recreational equipment to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). As I’ve said elsewhere, this is tantamount to boycotting companies that send “care packages” to US units in Iraq and Afghanistan, some of which have likewise been charged with misdeeds while serving in wars that some critics regard as intrinsically unjust or...More >>

The United Kingdom and Israel are currently under the sway of massive political unrest. In both countries, the cause of this is systemic economic problems, reflected in increasing public dissatisfaction with neoliberalism, but the contrast between the nature of the unrest is striking: the UK gets riots, while Israel gets some of the most inspiring political protests in generations. Why the difference, and what lessons can be drawn from it?

Socio-economic factors alone do not provide the answer. The failure of neoliberalism justifies massive political protests but it does not justify rioting. The people of Beer-Sheva's Schunat Daled live in equally poor conditions to the people of London's Tottenham. Contrary to what Eyal Clyne intimates, however, there is little sign that Israelis will turn on one another in the way that the rioters in the UK have done. So while economic distress explains the timing of the unrest, we have to look deeper into the political cultures of both countries to answer why Britain witnesses unfocused rage while Israel sees the possible birth of a new political movement. My unfashionable explanation for the difference, having lived in both countries, is that Israeli is a...More >>

Hizbullah Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Walid Sakariya * outlines a plan to destroy Israel, in which one hundred million "martyrs" spearheaded by Iran's army pulverizes the state of Israel.

Foreign policy analysts may consider this to be the stuff of sheer fantasy and wishful thinking; after all, how likely is it that Iraq would surrender its sovereignty to allow Iran's military (and an armed rabble of millions) to cross its territory with impunity?

If, following the US withdrawal, Iraq becomes a bridge linking Iran to Syria, the Iranian forces could cross Iraq and arrive in Syria, in order to participate in a direct war on the Golan front.

In that case, Israel would not be fighting Hizbullah alone. It would be fighting Hizbullah, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. This is the so-called "Shiite Crescent" that they fear. Since Iran dominates this [axis], the Arab countries refer to it as the "Shiite Crescent."

If Hizbullah has 50,000 missiles and can destroy some targets in Israel, the equation will completely change when Syria and Iran join the war. You will have the strategic superiority and a force large enough to pulverize Israel, even if this war

...More >>

Israel is aflame. Figuratively.

It began weeks ago, with doctors protesting their low salaries; then the nurses joined in complaining there are not enough staff positions to cope with overcrowded wards. Then a national campaign began because of the high price of dairy products, and that soon spread to other consumerables. Recently “the students” (a wide-ranging designation if ever there was one) began a campaign to achieve affordable housing. They were joined by “young couples”, and then by single mothers, working mothers, the aged, the disabled, the unemployed – all yelling for price reductions, lower taxes, affordable health care, affordable housing.

The protests have been largely a-political, although it didn’t take long for politicians to spot the niche. Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu is taking flak from all sides, even though the situation – a result of years of social justice errors and geo-political issues – is far from his making.

Israel’s economy is strong. Israel recovered quickly from the world financial crisis, and real estate prices have remained stable (part of the problem apparently). Israel’s currency stands up well to market forces and unemployment is at an all-time low. Tourism is at an all-time high, restaurants are packed, hotels booked...More >>

In Arab countries, for a start.

H/T EoZMore >>

Think the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a simple story of "greedy Zionists" living on stolen Palestinian land? Think again.

Fact #1: The name, "West Bank", was coined by Jordan during its illegal occupation of the area between 1949 and 1967. For thousands of years, the area was known as Judea and Samaria, the birthplace of Judaism...

More >>

After the debacle of the so-called “Freedom Flotilla”, and the sheer comedy of the “Flytilla”, it seems like an entirely fair question to ask:

What’s more important to the Flotilla activists and their Palestinian allies? Helping Palestinians? Or grandstanding against Israel?

The Canada Boat to Gaza and various left-wing Palestinian groups have tipped their hand recently, as they sent – and published on Rabble.ca – a letter to the Greek government stating a clear preference for solidarity over “charity”.

“We are so sorry not to accept your charity. The organizers and participants of the Freedom Flotilla recognize that our plight is not about humanitarian aid; it is about our human rights. They carry with them something more important than aid; they carry hope, love, solidarity and respect. Your offer to collude with our oppressors to deliver aid to us is totally REJECTED.”

Those following the Freedom Flotilla debacle would be shocked to learn that the Greek government is colluding with Hamas. They are the true oppressors of Gaza. Even if these groups refuse to admit it, they know this.

Hamas is also  the worst abusers of human rights not only in Gaza but in Israel as well....More >>

When I recently called for the Freedom Flotilla "activists" to do some actual good and perhaps bring help by sea to Syria's suffering refugees, I had no real expectation that any would take me up on it. And they haven't, though some have indeed arrived in the Syrian capital to... oh, this is too good.

Wait for it... wait for it...

To stand in solidarity with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad against "the schemes being plotted against him."

They're not even trying to hide what they're about anymore. 

The Flotidiots have proudly revealed themselves as staunch defenders of a regime with a bloodthirsty reputation for repression, torture and mass killing and an ideology suffused with a totalitarianism, anti-Semitism, and daydreams about genocide.

Let their comrades already slinking back to their own countries in defeat try to explain this latest disgrace. They are known by the company they keep.

Jonathon Narvey is the Editor of The Propagandist

H/T EoZ...More >>

Readers of political commentary on the Middle East will frequently see reference to the 'one-state solution' in relation to the Arab-Israeli conflict. What perhaps is often not sufficiently clear is what lies behind that particular political ethos, exactly who is promoting it and why.

Advocates of the 'one state solution' are, by definition, opposed to the two-state solution – i.e. the creation, as a result of negotiations between the relevant parties, of a Palestinian State which will exist side by side – hopefully in peace and good neighbourly relations - with the Jewish State of Israel.  This has been the premise behind the entire peace process since 1993. It is the basis upon which the Oslo Accords and later the Roadmap were built. It was the logic behind Israel's agreeing to the PLO being allowed to establish the Palestinian Authority and Israeli concessions on areas A and B. It is also the concept upon which all diplomatic efforts to bring peace to the region have been – and still are – based.

As frustrating as the peace process has been, the two-state solution remains the stated goal of the international community as well as successive Israeli governments during the last...More >>

Pages

Loading...

BUY @ the eSTORE

propagandist tshirt political merchandise buy magazine

Sponsor The Propagandist

Buy The Detective vs. the Slime Monster from Outer Space

political documentaries

Join The Propagandist

Buy A History of The Middle Eastside