The Arab Spring Ushers in a New Age of Terror and It's Our Fault
You ain't seen nothing yet, claims MI-5's spy chief. Naturally, radicalized terrorists are not going to stay over there. These people are going to bring their wars with them:
"Some will return to the U.K. and pose a threat here," Evans said. "This is a new and worrying development and could get worse as events unfold. So we will have to manage the short-term risks if there is to be a long-term reward from the Arab Spring."
Yeah, we knew that. But the spin that's coming out of the usual dark corners is pathetic.
Disturbingly (but not unpredictably), RussiaToday brings in "Middle East Peace Activist" Franklin Lamb (a regular on the network) to explain the situation -- presumably to confuse viewers who weren't paying attention into thinking that this was actually the head of MI-5. Why else would a "respectable" media organization bring in a blatantly partisan useful idiot like this dud to try to explain an intelligence assessment? They introduce him as an "Activist" -- when as a news organization, you would think they would want to talk to Director General Security Service M15 Jonathan Evans directly, or a British intelligence "Analyst" if they wanted the real story, no?
Lamb gives away his game of trying to blame the West for the Talibanization of the Arab world since the revolutions, in response to the reporter's question about why Arabs come to the West and become radicalized to join terrorist groups (Weirdly assuming they weren't radicalized before they came over).
Lamb's response is pure anti-imperialist, conspiracy theorist hogwash.
"Well, I think there's a lot more that we don't know about who haven't made it public..." -- for this, possibly read that Jews/Neo-Cons/Masons/Norwegian Templar Knights are really behind this show. Moving on.
"You mentioned earlier terrorist training camps -- well of course, that's one point of view. Are they terrorists or are they liberators with a strong program and strong ideology? My point is why they even exist is for dignity or to overthrow some dictators. But when you've got an operation like NATO slaughtering civilians in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, of course it's going to activate them and give them the opportunity..."
And there you have it. Our "Activist" starts off earlier in the program criticizing the West for inadvertently allying with (and possibly training) Al Quada terrorists in Libya. But then when we find out these radicals aren't terrorists after all; nothing wrong with fighting for dignity and overthrowing some dictators.
Clearly, we've misjudged these Al Qaeda types. They're heroes. And the vampiric West, which is "slaughtering civilians" all over the place (because we don't fight terrorists, we train them), is the real reason we've got terrorist radicalization -- but wait, I thought the terrorists were heroes -- but they're dangerous radicals -- but, but, but... (HEAD EXPLODES).
Jonathon Narvey is the Editor of The Propagandist