Gaddafi's Letter To Obama And The Response
Libyan Mad Dog Mu'aumer Qaddaffi (at least, that's the way he spells it) has written a letter to US President Barack Obama reproduced below. It's not quite a letter of surrender. But in atypical fashion, the dictator seems to acknowledge the USA's vast military superiority, its pragmatism and capacity for mercy -- no part of which has ever made it into a previous speech by regimes throughout the Middle East, who often rail against a decaying and corrupt United States that kills at will.
If Obama chooses to respond, perhaps it could go something like this:
Dear Mad Dog,
It is time for change in Libya. You had your chance. Actually, you had infinite chances over your decades of rule. Since you're not stepping down, you are going to die. Whether by a bomb dropped from a French jet or the blade of one of your personal guard, your end is coming soon.
President of the United Staes of America
PS: I'm not your son. But I guess the letter you wrote makes you my bitch. Suck on that.
LETTER FROM GADDAFI TO OBAMA
Our son, Excellency,
We have been hurt more morally that physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you. Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the U.S.A. We Endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaigne. You are a man who has enough courage to annul a wrong and mistaken action. I am sure that you are able to shoulder the responsibility for that.
Enough evidence is available, Bearing in mind that you are the president of the strongest power in the world nowadays, and since Nato is waging an unjust war against a small people of a developing country. This country had already been subjected to embargo and sanctions, furthermore it also suffered a direct military armed aggression during Reagan's time. This country is Libya.
Hence, to serving world peace ... Friendship between our peoples ... and for the sake of economic, and security cooperation against terror, you are in a position to keep Nato off the Libyan affair for good. As you know too well democracy and building of civil society cannot be achieved by means of missiles and aircraft, or by backing armed member of AlQuaeda in Benghazi.
You, yourself, said on many occasions, one of them in the UN General Assembly, I was witness to that personally, that America is not responsible for the security of other peoples. That America helps only. This is the right logic.
Our dear son, Excellency, Baraka Hussein Abu oumama, your intervention is the name of the U.S.A. is a must, so that Nato would withdraw finally from the Libyan affair. Libya should be left to Libyans within the African union frame.
The problem now stands as follows:-
1. There is Nato intervention politically as well as military.
2. Terror conducted by AlQaueda gangs that have been armed in some cities, and by force refused to allow people to go back to their normal life, and carry on with exercising their social people's power as usual.
Leader of the Revolution